Dealing with Failing Students, Budget Cuts, Meetings
Would you let your child go to the school that you work at?
When I was in elementary school, my mother worked at my school. I didn't feel weird about it. I thought it was cool. I wasn't given special privileges. My teachers didn't interrupt her while she was in a classroom. They kept it professional and only approached her about me during conferences. I wasn't a bad kid. I never received a referral in elementary school or "timeout." But now that I’m in high school, I would probably hate it. I'm not a bad student, but I think it would be awkward. No one is perfect, when I get in trouble it would be ten times worse if my teachers started abusing the fact that my mother is in the building. As long as it remained very professional, I’m sure it would be okay. However, it will still be awkward. This goes along with a testimonial of a woman from another blogging site. She said, "I chose to have my son go to the same school where I teach. As teachers you know how busy the day is, and even though last year he was in the class right next door to me I didn't find out about his day until after school. I've always told his teachers that I know he isn't perfect and that I would like to know when he isn't doing what he is supposed to. So far his teachers have been honest with me about him in a professional way; meaning at conferences or after school. I would have been upset too if they interrupted my teaching time!"
I’m sure some people would parents and students would oppose the idea. I’m not sure why, unless the child skips school or does poorly in classes. I personally don’t want my children at the school I work at UNLESS it's the only school in the district that offers a program that they really like. I think it would be better for me.
When I was in elementary school, my mother worked at my school. I didn't feel weird about it. I thought it was cool. I wasn't given special privileges. My teachers didn't interrupt her while she was in a classroom. They kept it professional and only approached her about me during conferences. I wasn't a bad kid. I never received a referral in elementary school or "timeout." But now that I’m in high school, I would probably hate it. I'm not a bad student, but I think it would be awkward. No one is perfect, when I get in trouble it would be ten times worse if my teachers started abusing the fact that my mother is in the building. As long as it remained very professional, I’m sure it would be okay. However, it will still be awkward. This goes along with a testimonial of a woman from another blogging site. She said, "I chose to have my son go to the same school where I teach. As teachers you know how busy the day is, and even though last year he was in the class right next door to me I didn't find out about his day until after school. I've always told his teachers that I know he isn't perfect and that I would like to know when he isn't doing what he is supposed to. So far his teachers have been honest with me about him in a professional way; meaning at conferences or after school. I would have been upset too if they interrupted my teaching time!"
I’m sure some people would parents and students would oppose the idea. I’m not sure why, unless the child skips school or does poorly in classes. I personally don’t want my children at the school I work at UNLESS it's the only school in the district that offers a program that they really like. I think it would be better for me.
How do you help a failing student?
Some people believe in tough love while others believe in an extra helping hand. Some people believe it depends on the student. I would agree with that because not two students are alike. Some respond better to tough love like challenging them more in class by making them participate more. Some students couldn't handle this and might think you are picking on them. Some students require may parent meetings. some just need a little extra help to grasp the concept this is where the problem comes in. it’s hard to read student and figure out which approach is the best approach. http://www.ehow.com/how_7904886_student-failing-school.html suggests, "Encourage the child to speak to you. The failing student must feel comfortable in class, so let him know you are there for him. Find out if he has any issues that are hindering his school performance. You may be able to help the student get back on track by just having a talk." Which approach do you think is best?
Some people believe in tough love while others believe in an extra helping hand. Some people believe it depends on the student. I would agree with that because not two students are alike. Some respond better to tough love like challenging them more in class by making them participate more. Some students couldn't handle this and might think you are picking on them. Some students require may parent meetings. some just need a little extra help to grasp the concept this is where the problem comes in. it’s hard to read student and figure out which approach is the best approach. http://www.ehow.com/how_7904886_student-failing-school.html suggests, "Encourage the child to speak to you. The failing student must feel comfortable in class, so let him know you are there for him. Find out if he has any issues that are hindering his school performance. You may be able to help the student get back on track by just having a talk." Which approach do you think is best?
How do budget cuts directly affect you in the classroom?
Because I haven't worked as a teacher yet, I can't personally ask this question. This is what my teacher, Mr. Johnson, said that budget cuts affect the amount of resources he has in the classroom. This kind of stresses him but he learns to deal with it. My teacher, Ms. Rodier, they take away from supplies that make teaching easier. She also said that if the budget for staffing is cut that means more less teachers and more students to a teacher. Education reform is one of those common issues in election debates. Elected officials always say that are education system needs to be reworked to produce more competitive and prepared students. However, not many have done anything to stop education from losing funding when he budget gets cut. http://712educators.about.com/od/issuesineducation/tp/teaching_budget_cuts.htm says that, "In a field where in good times about 20% of teachers leave the profession in the first three years, budget cuts mean less incentive for educators to continue teaching. Following are ten ways that budget cuts harm teachers and accordingly their students." ... the author of the article continued by saying, "Obviously, this is a big one. Lucky teachers will just have their pay raises reduced to close to nothing. The less fortunate ones will be in school districts that have decided to cut teacher pay. Further, teachers who work extra by taking on summer school classes or running activities that provide supplemental pay will often find their positions eliminated or their hours/pay reduced."
Because I haven't worked as a teacher yet, I can't personally ask this question. This is what my teacher, Mr. Johnson, said that budget cuts affect the amount of resources he has in the classroom. This kind of stresses him but he learns to deal with it. My teacher, Ms. Rodier, they take away from supplies that make teaching easier. She also said that if the budget for staffing is cut that means more less teachers and more students to a teacher. Education reform is one of those common issues in election debates. Elected officials always say that are education system needs to be reworked to produce more competitive and prepared students. However, not many have done anything to stop education from losing funding when he budget gets cut. http://712educators.about.com/od/issuesineducation/tp/teaching_budget_cuts.htm says that, "In a field where in good times about 20% of teachers leave the profession in the first three years, budget cuts mean less incentive for educators to continue teaching. Following are ten ways that budget cuts harm teachers and accordingly their students." ... the author of the article continued by saying, "Obviously, this is a big one. Lucky teachers will just have their pay raises reduced to close to nothing. The less fortunate ones will be in school districts that have decided to cut teacher pay. Further, teachers who work extra by taking on summer school classes or running activities that provide supplemental pay will often find their positions eliminated or their hours/pay reduced."
Is it fair for meeting to be called for teachers during instructional time?
In my opinion, it is not fair for teachers to be expected to have meetings during instructional time. It takes them away from their classroom. Class time is designated to help the student grow and learn. When teachers used that time to take meetings students lose out. It is very inconsiderate for such things to take place. I know this from experience. I have sat in a classroom all day doing nothing for lack of knowing how to even get started since I couldn't ask may teacher. When I become a teacher, I will refuse to attend meeting during instructional time unless they are mandatory. I wouldn't want my students to lose out like I have done sometimes. I could not find any articles on this topic but please leave your opinion on the comment page.
In my opinion, it is not fair for teachers to be expected to have meetings during instructional time. It takes them away from their classroom. Class time is designated to help the student grow and learn. When teachers used that time to take meetings students lose out. It is very inconsiderate for such things to take place. I know this from experience. I have sat in a classroom all day doing nothing for lack of knowing how to even get started since I couldn't ask may teacher. When I become a teacher, I will refuse to attend meeting during instructional time unless they are mandatory. I wouldn't want my students to lose out like I have done sometimes. I could not find any articles on this topic but please leave your opinion on the comment page.
Is special treatment given to star athletes?
According to http://education-portal.com/articles/Do_Student_Athletes_Deserve_Special_Treatment.html, 'Feeble class lists' are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to accusations of preferential treatment for student athletes. From the very beginning of the college application process, allowances are offered to prospective students who demonstrate athletic potential. These individuals may be subject to lower admissions standards than non-competing peers and many, of purse, receive scholarships. These financial rewards often don't factor in academic promise, only the skills students bring to the field or court." this is a sad truth, it's easier for an athletic person who isn't that bright to get a scholarship than a smart person who don’t compete in sports. The article continues on by saying that, "Many schools offer special tutoring for athletes to help them earn grades that ensure eligibility for competition. These individuals also routinely have access to early registration so that they can choose classes that won't conflict with athletics. And professors are often expected to make accommodations for students missing class, work and exams because of competitions. Student athletes may even get free books and enhanced food programs. They can also benefit from university officials looking the other way or instituting only mild punishments when it comes to inappropriate and criminal behavior on campus." I do think that special tutoring should be offered because during a tournament or on game days they will have less time to devote to their studies than non-athletes. But participating on an athletic team is a privilege; they should know that school work should come before extracurricular activities.
According to http://education-portal.com/articles/Do_Student_Athletes_Deserve_Special_Treatment.html, 'Feeble class lists' are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to accusations of preferential treatment for student athletes. From the very beginning of the college application process, allowances are offered to prospective students who demonstrate athletic potential. These individuals may be subject to lower admissions standards than non-competing peers and many, of purse, receive scholarships. These financial rewards often don't factor in academic promise, only the skills students bring to the field or court." this is a sad truth, it's easier for an athletic person who isn't that bright to get a scholarship than a smart person who don’t compete in sports. The article continues on by saying that, "Many schools offer special tutoring for athletes to help them earn grades that ensure eligibility for competition. These individuals also routinely have access to early registration so that they can choose classes that won't conflict with athletics. And professors are often expected to make accommodations for students missing class, work and exams because of competitions. Student athletes may even get free books and enhanced food programs. They can also benefit from university officials looking the other way or instituting only mild punishments when it comes to inappropriate and criminal behavior on campus." I do think that special tutoring should be offered because during a tournament or on game days they will have less time to devote to their studies than non-athletes. But participating on an athletic team is a privilege; they should know that school work should come before extracurricular activities.